What contingency plans are the deep state planning if a Trump landslide occurs in the election?
@MikeBenzCyber suggests that they may refuse to certify Trump as President by using the 14th Amendment and the House of Representatives to give the electors to Kamala claiming Trump is not fit to serve given January 6th after a crisis event occurs.
This is a dangerous cornered animal. It's going to be very interesting to see what happens in the next couple of months.
"They "may" make the argument that Donald Trump is disqualified under the 14th amendment because of January 6th... There is too much on the line for them. The fog of war is too thick. I think that this is the most important election in US history... I think if it was a fair fight he would win in a landslide but the fight is not fair but just how unfair it is, is still unclear."
Rumble (https://rumble.com/v5khaud-mike-benz-th ... dment.html)
What contingency plans are the deep state planning if a Trump landslide occurs in the election?
Re: What contingency plans are the deep state planning if a Trump landslide occurs in the election?
In response to Mike Benz and the clip on Jamie Raskin...
Remember, congress was so upset that Mike Pence could have sent the election certifications back to the states that they passed a new law that says they MUST certify the election results. So any contingency plans laid out by Raskin and other democrats/RINOs will fall flat on their face.
The new law established the following:
- The role of VP is purely ceremonial
- In order to raise an objection, they now have to have 1/5 of the senate and 1/5 of the house to have signed agreement to the objection. They can only raise one objection and take only 5 minutes to raise it.
- Only certified elector votes can be counted (in other words, no alternates)
Not only that - they changed the presidential transition law in response to the delay of transitioning Biden lol
- Presidential transition must begin within 5 days of the election
- Now instead of using the term "President-elect" and "Vice President-elect" they changed it to "apparent successful candidate" so that even if they aren't determined to be "president-elect" yet, the transition process must start.
All of these changes will now boomerang on them and poor Jamie Raskin will have to go pout in a corner somewhere.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-con ... /4573/text
repost on X (
Remember, congress was so upset that Mike Pence could have sent the election certifications back to the states that they passed a new law that says they MUST certify the election results. So any contingency plans laid out by Raskin and other democrats/RINOs will fall flat on their face.
The new law established the following:
- The role of VP is purely ceremonial
- In order to raise an objection, they now have to have 1/5 of the senate and 1/5 of the house to have signed agreement to the objection. They can only raise one objection and take only 5 minutes to raise it.
- Only certified elector votes can be counted (in other words, no alternates)
Not only that - they changed the presidential transition law in response to the delay of transitioning Biden lol
- Presidential transition must begin within 5 days of the election
- Now instead of using the term "President-elect" and "Vice President-elect" they changed it to "apparent successful candidate" so that even if they aren't determined to be "president-elect" yet, the transition process must start.
All of these changes will now boomerang on them and poor Jamie Raskin will have to go pout in a corner somewhere.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-con ... /4573/text
repost on X (