The hit on Kash Patel is going to make a lot of sense very soon.
The hit on Kash Patel is going to make a lot of sense very soon.
"I promise you this. Look at me. Everybody zoom in. Focker, look at me... The hit on Kash Patel is going to make a lot of sense very soon. There's a reason the media and Democrats want him out NOW. Flag it." 
Re: The hit on Kash Patel is going to make a lot of sense very soon.
FBI Director Kash Patel TRUTH NUKED a nasty ass reporter asking him if he’s INTOXICATED while on the Job, and said “any of you want to participate in that lie” he will sue their asses into oblivion
“BRING IT ON” he said.
ABSOLUTELY SAVAGE!
https://rumble.com/v78tr92-fbi-kash-pat ... d-on-.html
ReTWEET (
“BRING IT ON” he said.
ABSOLUTELY SAVAGE!
https://rumble.com/v78tr92-fbi-kash-pat ... d-on-.html
ReTWEET (Re: The hit on Kash Patel is going to make a lot of sense very soon.
A federal judge in Houston has dismissed FBI Director Kash Patel's defamation lawsuit against former FBI counterintelligence official Frank Figliuzzi, who said on MSNBC's Morning Joe in May 2025 that Patel had "been visible at nightclubs far more than he has been on the seventh floor of the Hoover building."
U.S. District Court Judge George Hanks Jr., an Obama appointee, ruled the comment was "rhetorical hyperbole that cannot constitute defamation," writing that no reasonable person would have taken it literally.
Patel had sought at least $75,000 in damages. The judge denied Figliuzzi's request to recover attorney fees under Texas' anti-SLAPP law. (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 738199007/)
The ruling came one day after Patel separately filed a $250 million defamation lawsuit against The Atlantic over a report alleging he engaged in excessive drinking and unexplained absences on the job — claims Patel denied at a press conference Tuesday, saying "I've never been intoxicated on the job."
Figliuzzi's attorney called the dismissal "a victory for press freedom and the First Amendment."
XPOST (
U.S. District Court Judge George Hanks Jr., an Obama appointee, ruled the comment was "rhetorical hyperbole that cannot constitute defamation," writing that no reasonable person would have taken it literally.
Patel had sought at least $75,000 in damages. The judge denied Figliuzzi's request to recover attorney fees under Texas' anti-SLAPP law. (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 738199007/)
The ruling came one day after Patel separately filed a $250 million defamation lawsuit against The Atlantic over a report alleging he engaged in excessive drinking and unexplained absences on the job — claims Patel denied at a press conference Tuesday, saying "I've never been intoxicated on the job."
Figliuzzi's attorney called the dismissal "a victory for press freedom and the First Amendment."
XPOST (